麻豆传媒AV

Skip to content

Double Indemnity - A Century of Film

Billy Wilder was one of the greatest directors in American film, look no further for proof.
Double Indemnity
Fred MacMurray and Barbara Stanwyck plan a murder.

A Century of Film is an ongoing series where Devin Wilger watches one movie from each year between 1917 and today. For the year of 1944, it鈥檚 Double Indemnity.

Voiceover narration has a bad rap, and I can鈥檛 really figure out why. Sure, there were plenty of 鈥渟creenwriting gurus鈥 that railed against it, parodied brilliantly in Adaptation, but there are too many examples of great narration out there that it seems foolish to just accept, at face value, that narration is inherently bad. Today鈥檚 film is one of those, because Double Indemnity is a film built around its narrator, and it鈥檚 a great example of how a good narrator can fundamentally change your experience.

We鈥檙e introduced to insurance salesman Walter Neff (Fred MacMurray) as he rushes to his office, bleeding from a gunshot wound (which isn鈥檛 immediately obvious but grows through the film), ready to make a confession to his boss Barton Keyes (Edward G. Robinson). He killed a man for money - and a woman - and he didn't get the money and he didn't get the woman. Pretty, isn't it?

That鈥檚 when we launch into the film itself, and knowing how this story ends has an undeniable effect - it makes every scene, every interaction, incredibly tense. Neff is a bit of a rube, and MacMurray is good at playing him as the horny idiot he winds up being. That鈥檚 perfect for Phyllis (Barbara Stanwyck), who has a husband she wants to get rid of and some insurance fraud to commit. Who better to help her with that than an insurance salesman who would prefer if she didn鈥檛 have a husband? He even tosses in the double indemnity clause that gives the film its title, extra cash if their victim dies on a train. So begins plans for the perfect murder, even if we already know that there is no such thing, and they鈥檙e already on a trolley car to the cemetery.

In some ways, the narration can help the film feel like a great film you鈥檙e watching the second time, details that might not stand out are highlighted because you know where they鈥檙e going to lead. Neff signs his own death warrant the second he gets obsessed with Phyllis鈥 anklet, for example. But there鈥檚 still tension because you don鈥檛 completely know how everything is going to go down, you just know it鈥檚 going to go badly. Along with Miklos Rosza鈥檚 score, it makes even the light scenes tense, because there鈥檚 always a chance that Neff is going to slip up, and this could be the moment where he does it.

Even without that tension it鈥檚 worth watching, because this has some amazing writing. Raymond Chandler and Billy Wilder didn鈥檛 get along great during the writing process, but whatever stress they had was worth it, because every line is pure gold. The speeding ticket exchange between Neff and Phyllis, the narration itself, Keyes鈥 raving about a 鈥榣ittle man鈥 who helps him see when someone鈥檚 trying to pull a fast one on an insurance company, it鈥檚 great stuff. It鈥檚 fast paced, witty and immensely quotable. I could listen to these characters talk all day, a common thread through Wilder鈥檚 films, he had a rare gift for making words sing. There鈥檚 not a bad line here, and the best lines are easily some of my favorites ever uttered on screen. That the dialog still feels natural and doesn鈥檛 feel like a pair of writers showing off is a testament to their skill, and since Wilder鈥檚 films were frequently the best written movies in Hollywood at any given moment, that鈥檚 no accident.

Wilder also filmed like nobody else, with a habit of making his films just gorgeous enough to make an impact without ever getting too flashy. The look here - black and white, with light chopped up by venetian blinds - is the foundation for film noir. Everything is in dark rooms, nobody turns on the lights unless absolutely necessary, and even the baby food aisle of a grocery store is given an air of menace.

The other week, someone asked if there was one director, living or dead, I would want to work with, who would it be? The answer has to be Billy Wilder, and if you want to know why just watch Double Indemnity. The man who made that has to have been a genius, with a gift for the English language that few people have. It鈥檚 easy to make a film about a murder gone wrong, but it鈥檚 rare that someone can make one as good as this one.

Next up, it鈥檚 1945, and time to ring The Bells of St. Mary鈥檚.

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks